ext_32966 ([identity profile] tenacious-snail.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] pat 2005-01-29 09:44 pm (UTC)

um, my guess would be "thousands". But that is just based on my observable sample. Slightly more on the West Coast, and during not-winter.

Ame Chan's suggestion seems very good to me. Right now, I am not looking to be someone's spouse, so I am going to start looking carefully for boxes and string that might be carefully disguised at a potluck (eep! I may be going to one of those tonight).

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting