pat: (Default)
pat ([personal profile] pat) wrote2006-05-21 06:58 pm

(no subject)

Barbaro made it through surgery. Ruffian didn't.

At this point, we're never going to know if he really was as great as that Derby indicated. (I haven't seen a horse run like that since.... Affirmed, or maybe before.) But maybe his sons and daughters will preserve some of that unrealized greatness.

This is what I wrote elsewhere after the Derby:


I saw the Derby. Unlike other years, I haven't been following the pre-Derby races -- and the papers haven't been providing much coverage. Heading to the post, the commentators mentioned that it was a strong field with several unbeatens in it.

Barbaro won. By seven lengths, going away. After sitting just off the leaders who were running quite a fast pace.

There were a lot of horses -- twenty --this year: the Derby is crowded. And some of those were presumably not really Derby caliber, and perhaps caused other, better, horses some problems.

But I don't think any horse in that field could have caught Barbaro. Had this been the Belmont, the margin of victory would have been larger -- he looked to be just warming up.

It's too soon to anoint the horse a superstar, but damn, what a performance.

I like him even more because he's *not* a pretty horse. His neck looks sort of scrawny, his head is not aristocratic but sort of chunky-looking. Then again, as people who've read the book or seen the movie know, Seabiscuit wasn't a pretty horse, either.

Wow. I really hope he's as good as he seemed on Saturday.