When writing about legal subjects, it's really important to figure out what the current state of the law is because it changes. Prompted by a post over at the Mad Monk, I am writing a series about the legal issue closest to my heart, capital punishment.
In the process, I discovered, after much searching (and refusing to stop until I got an answer as to the state of the law now -- and not just from the state code data bases, those search engines are terrible (and Texas doesn't even vouch for the accuracy of theirs! They say you use it at your own risk!) -- a really good bit of news.
In 2004, Virginia repealed its notorious 21-day rule. This was the rule that required that all evidence of innocence be submitted within twenty-one days after the final recording of judgment against a defendant. Reading their codes, they now have systems in place that allow for what appear to be no time limits on introduction on biological evidence. (They also provide for looser time limits in regard to non-biological evidence.)
I cannot tell you how happy this makes me. The 21-day rule was an abomination, a barbarism. It is very good that it is gone. I don't know if its repeal had anything to do with the fact that Virginia did not execute anyone in 2005 (although they have executed 3 people thus far in 2006).
Virginia is often lumped in with Texas in terms of the "states that kill the most people." This is unfair. Virginia at 97 execution since 1976 is much closer to Oklahoma with 88 than it is to Texas with 372. Actually, if you look in terms of executions per capita, the winner is Oklahoma, with Virginia coming fourth (behind Texas and Missouri). (When adjusted for population, Florida -- the other state listed as being part of the unholy trinity leading the march to the death chamber -- falls to fourteenth.)
I realize this is damning with faint praise. Gee, you don't kill as many people as the other states do is not exactly a ringing endorsement. However, fair is fair -- and the passage of the twenty-one day rule is a step in the right direction.
In the process, I discovered, after much searching (and refusing to stop until I got an answer as to the state of the law now -- and not just from the state code data bases, those search engines are terrible (and Texas doesn't even vouch for the accuracy of theirs! They say you use it at your own risk!) -- a really good bit of news.
In 2004, Virginia repealed its notorious 21-day rule. This was the rule that required that all evidence of innocence be submitted within twenty-one days after the final recording of judgment against a defendant. Reading their codes, they now have systems in place that allow for what appear to be no time limits on introduction on biological evidence. (They also provide for looser time limits in regard to non-biological evidence.)
I cannot tell you how happy this makes me. The 21-day rule was an abomination, a barbarism. It is very good that it is gone. I don't know if its repeal had anything to do with the fact that Virginia did not execute anyone in 2005 (although they have executed 3 people thus far in 2006).
Virginia is often lumped in with Texas in terms of the "states that kill the most people." This is unfair. Virginia at 97 execution since 1976 is much closer to Oklahoma with 88 than it is to Texas with 372. Actually, if you look in terms of executions per capita, the winner is Oklahoma, with Virginia coming fourth (behind Texas and Missouri). (When adjusted for population, Florida -- the other state listed as being part of the unholy trinity leading the march to the death chamber -- falls to fourteenth.)
I realize this is damning with faint praise. Gee, you don't kill as many people as the other states do is not exactly a ringing endorsement. However, fair is fair -- and the passage of the twenty-one day rule is a step in the right direction.
Tags: