Yesterday was J's first game in the "major leagues" -- the highest division in his age group in our local Little League. They are a lot stricter enforcing the rules at this level, one of them being that players are forbidden to wear any jewelry except religious items.

One boy had what looked like a braided cloth ring around his neck. It did not have a religious medal on it, so the umpire ordered it off. I don't know why the boy was wearing it, but it was clearly something that could not be simply slipped off -- it was smaller than his head. It could not be removed without destroying it. The child was adamant that he was not going to remove it.

After much argument -- with the coach supporting his player -- the umpire let it go. One parent behind me remarked they should simply cut the thing off and then said (and I am not making this up) "They have to teach the kids to obey the rules. It's a matter of professionalism."

I was so stunned at this comment that I was unable to speak. I realize -- or at least hope -- that the woman may not have thought about exactly what she said, but still....

Sheesh. Those Little League scandals that crop up now and then don't seem so unbelievable.

From: [identity profile] patgreene.livejournal.com

Re: more thoughts and clarifications



It was the bit about "bending the rules to suit his whims" that put my back up.


I understand your reaction, but I just think that sarcasm tends to chill discussion rather than enable it. (I'm guilty of this myself, sometimes, I admit.)

From: [identity profile] dawnd.livejournal.com

Re: more thoughts and clarifications


Well, I did LABEL it as sarcastic anyway! I CAN learn from the examples of others on occasion. *wry smile*
.

Profile

pat: (Default)
pat

Most Popular Tags

Powered by Dreamwidth Studios

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags