There has been a lot of talk on my friends list about how the Brits handled their bombing so much better than America handled 9/11.
I think many people are guilty of selective memory. America showed a great deal of fortitude and determination in the short period following the terrorist attacks. That the country has had their real experiences and fears used by unscrupulous men to incubate a hatred and mistrust of the rest of the world does not change that.
To claim otherwise is to be unfair to Americans, especially New Yorkers.
I have some more thoughts about this, and why people see the reactions so differently, but I am saving them for a later post.
I think many people are guilty of selective memory. America showed a great deal of fortitude and determination in the short period following the terrorist attacks. That the country has had their real experiences and fears used by unscrupulous men to incubate a hatred and mistrust of the rest of the world does not change that.
To claim otherwise is to be unfair to Americans, especially New Yorkers.
I have some more thoughts about this, and why people see the reactions so differently, but I am saving them for a later post.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
I saw a good bit of that this past week, too, not from Londoners but from people halfway around the world.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
Yes, they do stiff upper lip, and must be seen to cope with fortitude, but this exacts a price.
From:
no subject
There is also one other big difference. There was the expectation that Something would be, and had to be, Done about the attacks that would be sufficiently momentous that it would make sure they would never happen again. This was reflected in both individual acts (like the murder of the Sikh) and more generally with the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq.
We don't have the same expectation in the UK. We know that things like this are an unfortunate fact of life. 30 and more years of IRA violence has taught us that. If our response to the Birmingham pub bombings etc. etc. (seemingly ad infinitum in the 70s) had been the same as the US reaction to 11/9/01 then we would have been bombing Boston, New York and Washington DC on the basis that these were places that funded, and backed terrorism, and that the courts and national leaders were allowing terrorists shelter from extradition in the US. Such acts though are not, in general, helpful, and I think this is something that the UK population has taken on board far more than the US.
The way to beat terrorism is not to lash out, on an individual or national scale. On the contrary, it is defeated by letting it have no effect on you. Life must continue as unchanged as possible. Our traditional laws, attitudes and standards must stay the same. We should not leap into hysterically oppressive new laws, nor should we lash out at perceived enemies in other countries. To do otherwise is to give control of our very societies to the terrorists.
In this respect the US reaction to 11/9/01 has been deeply flawed. I just hope our reaction to 07/07/05 is more sane.
From:
no subject
From:
no subject
later political/social issues within England time will tell
---
US policies since 9/11 have pissed on the high level of worldwide support from the event
the UN /international treaties / The World Court / InterPol / Geneva Convention.. tossed away
The population within the United States is being isolated from the world